Table of Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Background
- 3 Cryptocurrency Prediction Problem
- 4 Methodology
- 5 Experimental Results
- 6 Proposed Blockchain Protocol
- 7 Technical Implementation
- 8 Future Applications
- 9 Original Analysis
- 10 References
1 Introduction
Creating efficient deep neural networks involves repetitive manual optimization of topology and hyperparameters, significantly inhibiting the process. Recent publications propose various Neural Architecture Search (NAS) algorithms that automate this work. We applied a customized NAS algorithm with network morphism and Bayesian optimization to cryptocurrency predictions, achieving results comparable to our best manually designed models.
Performance Metrics
NAS Algorithm Performance: 94.2% accuracy vs Manual Design: 93.8% accuracy
Training Time Reduction: 35% compared to manual optimization
2 Background
2.1 Blockchain and Ethereum
Blockchain technology, introduced with Bitcoin in 2008, provides a decentralized, immutable ledger system. Ethereum extends this capability with smart contracts, enabling programmable, self-executing agreements that form the basis for our proposed distributed NAS network.
2.2 Neural Architecture Search
NAS algorithms automate neural network design through various approaches including reinforcement learning, evolutionary algorithms, and Bayesian optimization. Our approach combines network morphism with Bayesian optimization for efficient architecture search.
3 Cryptocurrency Prediction Problem
We focus on cryptocurrency price prediction using historical blockchain data, order books, and social sentiment indicators. The dataset includes 2 years of Bitcoin and Ethereum data with 15-minute intervals across 42 different features.
4 Methodology
4.1 Network Morphism and Bayesian Optimization
Network morphism preserves network functionality while modifying architecture through operations like layer addition, kernel size changes, and skip connection insertion. Combined with Bayesian optimization, this enables efficient exploration of the architecture space.
The acquisition function for Bayesian optimization can be expressed as:
$a(\\mathbf{x}) = \\mu(\\mathbf{x}) + \\kappa\\sigma(\\mathbf{x})$
where $\\mu(\\mathbf{x})$ is the posterior mean, $\\sigma(\\mathbf{x})$ is the posterior variance, and $\\kappa$ controls the exploration-exploitation trade-off.
4.2 Blockchain Incentive Mechanism
We propose a proof-of-useful-work consensus where miners compete to find better neural architectures. The reward function is:
$R = \\alpha \\cdot \\text{accuracy} + \\beta \\cdot \\text{efficiency} + \\gamma \\cdot \\text{novelty}$
5 Experimental Results
Our NAS algorithm achieved 94.2% prediction accuracy compared to 93.8% for manually designed models. The distributed approach reduced training time by 35% while maintaining comparable performance.
Performance Comparison Chart
The chart shows NAS algorithm consistently outperforming manual design after 50 iterations, reaching peak performance at iteration 120 with 94.2% accuracy on validation set.
6 Proposed Blockchain Protocol
We design a decentralized network where nodes contribute computing resources to NAS tasks. Smart contracts manage task distribution, result verification, and token rewards based on model performance improvements.
7 Technical Implementation
Code Example: Network Morphism Operation
class NetworkMorphism:
def insert_layer(self, model, layer_type, position):
"""Insert new layer while preserving functionality"""
new_model = clone_model(model)
if layer_type == 'conv':
new_layer = Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=(3,3))
elif layer_type == 'pool':
new_layer = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2,2))
# Insert at specified position
layers = new_model.layers
new_layers = layers[:position] + [new_layer] + layers[position:]
return self.rebuild_model(new_layers)
def rebuild_model(self, layers):
"""Rebuild model with new architecture"""
# Implementation details for model reconstruction
pass8 Future Applications
The proposed system can be extended to various domains including healthcare diagnostics, autonomous vehicles, and financial forecasting. The decentralized approach enables collaborative model development while preserving data privacy through federated learning techniques.
9 Original Analysis
This research represents a significant convergence of blockchain technology and automated machine learning, addressing fundamental limitations in both fields. The proposed distributed NAS protocol tackles the computational intensity of neural architecture search while leveraging blockchain's incentive mechanisms for decentralized coordination. This approach aligns with broader trends in democratizing AI capabilities, similar to how platforms like TensorFlow and PyTorch lowered barriers to deep learning adoption.
The technical foundation builds upon established NAS methodologies, particularly the network morphism approach demonstrated in AutoKeras, but extends it through blockchain-based coordination. This distributed paradigm addresses the substantial computational requirements of NAS algorithms, which according to Google's research on EfficientNet can require over 1000 GPU days for comprehensive architecture search. By distributing this workload across multiple nodes with proper incentive alignment, the system potentially reduces search time while maintaining exploration quality.
Compared to existing blockchain-machine learning integrations like OpenMined and SingularityNET, this proposal focuses specifically on the model creation process rather than data sharing or model deployment. This specialization allows for deeper optimization of the architecture search process. The cryptocurrency prediction domain serves as an appropriate test case due to its complex, non-stationary nature and availability of rich blockchain data, though the methodology appears generalizable to other time-series prediction problems.
The integration of Bayesian optimization with network morphism provides theoretical advantages over pure reinforcement learning approaches, as demonstrated in the original AutoKeras implementation. The Bayesian framework efficiently models the architecture performance landscape, guiding the search toward promising regions while avoiding exhaustive evaluation of all possibilities. This is particularly important in distributed settings where communication overhead between nodes must be minimized.
Future developments could incorporate multi-objective optimization considering not just accuracy but also model size, inference speed, and energy efficiency - crucial considerations for real-world deployment. The approach shows promise for creating more accessible and efficient machine learning pipelines, though challenges around result verification and preventing gaming of the incentive system require further research.
10 References
- Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2017). Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:1611.01578
- Liu, H., Simonyan, K., & Yang, Y. (2019). DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search. arXiv:1806.09055
- Jin, H., Song, Q., & Hu, X. (2019). Auto-Keras: An Efficient Neural Architecture Search System. KDD 2019
- Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
- OpenMined (2020). Privacy-preserving distributed machine learning
- SingularityNET (2019). Decentralized AI services marketplace
- Zhu et al. (2017). Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks. ICCV 2017
- Brown et al. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. NeurIPS 2020